NEW YORK - NOVEMBER 30:  (NO SALES, NO ARCHIVE...Image by Getty Images via DaylifeAbout a month ago I switched email clients from Microsoft Outlook to Google Gmail. Having used Outlook since the beginning of time, this was a major switch, and I wanted to give myself time to adjust before comparing the two products. If you’re thinking of switching one way or the other, perhaps this post will help you reach a decision.

1. Biggest difference for me is folders (Outlook) versus labels (Gmail). With Outlook, every email can be put into a folder for archiving purposes. The pitfall of this is “folder creep”. I had so many folders and subfolders and sub-subfolders it became sometimes impossible to find a particular email. With Gmail, you can attach one or more label (like a tag) to a particular email, but they are archived all in one big lump. I like the fact you can assign multiple labels to an email, because it gives you more than one easy way to find a particular email if you’ve forgotten how you classified it. I think it’s easier to change label structures in Gmail than to change folder structures in Outlook – can anyone shed light on that?

2. No spam in Gmail. Nada. Zero. Life is good.

3. No system freeze with Gmail so far. With Outlook, the problem was ongoing.

4. Gmail lends itself to social networking. You can upload your entire Gmail contact list into Facebook or Twitter or whatever and search for friends. It takes all of about two minutes. You can chat with other Gmail users when they using Gmail, and probably a whole bunch of other things I haven’t had time to explore. How do you use Gmail for networking?

5. Gmail consolidates email strings (Google calls them conversations) into a single, expandable email, and displays the number of individual emails contained in the conversation. I’m not sure if I like that. With Outlook, each email stands on its own, so while you have duplications in your inbox, it’s always clear what you’re looking at when you open an email. With Gmail’s conversations, it took me a while to figure out how to expand and contract the display, and I’m still not sure how to delete one email within a conversation as opposed to the whole thing. Similarly, I’m not sure who I’m replying to in a conversation that has multiple senders and receivers that change from one email to the next.

6. Manipulating Microsoft Office files is easier in Outlook than in Gmail (big surprise). I miss being able to open a Word Document and instantly send it to an email recipient. Can’t do that in Gmail as far as I know. When you receive an Office document in Gmail, you have the option of downloading it or viewing it as an HTML page. Although downloading takes a bit of extra time, I am finding that it forces me to do something with the document. In Outlook, it’s easy to view a document, close it, and just let it sit with the email forever. But once I’ve gone to the trouble to download it, I have to save it somewhere – usually in the place I should have stored those Outlook attachments in the first place.

7. Adding and updating contacts is a breeze in Gmail and Outlook. Outlook gives you more fields of information to store, but Gmail has some slick features. For instance, Gmail suggests new contacts by displaying email addresses you’ve sent mail to that aren’t set up as contacts. Click on one of them, and the new contact is all but set up. You can also view an existing contact and pull up recent conversations with him/her. Very handy – another way to find archived emails.

8. With Outlook, you can set up multiple signatures. With Gmail, it appears you are limited to one. This is a major drawback, one which Google should address.

What do you think?
To me, these are the striking differences between the two email systems. What have I missed? Do you prefer one over the other, and how come?

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]