This is the first in a mini series on Twitter for B2B.
A B2B Twitter Presence Should Balance Experimentation with Discipline
A Twitter presence can be a valuable asset for a b2b firm – or a monumental waste of time. Too often, firms go into Twitter with the attitude, Let’s give it a try and see what happens. I’m all for experimentation, but for Twitter and other social media platforms, two things are likely to happen with this approach. You’ll wind up with months of aimless conversation and nothing to show for it, or worse, undercutting your brand by communicating in ways that are off putting to social media participants.
First Question – Are We Using Twitter to Engage or Inform?
In my mind, this is the starting point for b2b activity on Twitter. Is your purpose to push content to your target audience, or do you want to have conversations with your audience and try to build relationships? Either strategy is executable, and both can succeed. Each takes a completely different approach.
The Informational Twitter Strategy
Tweeting blog posts, press releases, opinions, industry relevant articles, sales promotions, Twitter-only discounts, trade show and news reporting – all this may be of genuine interest to customers and prospects. People follow companies on Twitter all the time to educate themselves, stay current with industry trend, and get the jump on special offers.In terms of resource allocation, the good news is, an informational Twitter strategy can be outsourced. You don’t need a staffer sitting in front of a monitor all day playing around on social media sites (for some execs, the ultimate nightmare scenario). I’m doing this type of twittering for companies, and it works well. I can pinpoint the audience and make connections. I can broadcast tweets with optimized content and get people to find and retweet them.
The bad news for an informational Twitter strategy – you need valuable, meaningful content to tweet about! You need real news, real sales promotions, real insights, and attention getting angles. In stark contrast to conventional wisdom, social media is not Seinfeld. Twitter is not a show about nothing. Tweets have to be about something, or people will pass you by in a heartbeat. There’s too much noise in interactive media for empty tweets to garner even a sliver of an audience. Think of this strategy as being the condensed version of The Wall Street Journal.
Metrics. How will you judge your success? For starters, track Twitter referrals to your websites, and monitor how often your tweets are retweeted – and by whom. You should also set up a Twitter landing page for your main site, and use it to direct visitors along the relationship path you want them to take. Ultimately, you want your Twitter community to do something – request information, arrange a sales meeting, order a product, etc. Your web presence must be shaped accordingly.
The Conversational Twitter Strategy
A conversational approach to Twitter is fully in the spirit of social media. The purpose here is to do some of what we talked about earlier, along with one-on-one and group discussions with both your core and peripheral Twitter followers. This strategy tends to humanize your firm and makes people more interested in retweeting you, evangelizing for you, writing about you, and most important – doing business with you. In short, a strategy of engagement offers the biggest potential rewards in terms of sales, branding, relationship building, and SEO (because you’re going to get more sites linking back to you).Resource allocation. To make a conversational Twitter strategy succeed, your firm needs internal support. Your Twitter identity must have a personal face, because people want to talk with a someone, not a company name. When they come to your Twitter profile page, they want to see a human being, not a corporate logo. Conversations are most effective when held in real time, so the company’s Twitter representative should be available for engagement pretty much all the time, and actively tweeting at regular, specific times. This type of tweeting can be outsourced, but doing so requires a close relationship with the agency doing the work.
With a conversational strategy, it’s useful to combine those serious business-focus tweets with observations about the weather and what was cooked for dinner last night. And while this gives many execs heartburn, it shouldn’t. Relationships with million dollar customers often begin at a cocktail party over stuffed mushrooms and a conversation about yesterday’s baseball game. Twitter is no different. People build relationships in social media just as they do everywhere else.
Metrics for conversational tweeting follow the same guidelines as informational tweeting, but with a little more depth. I’d want to pay close attention to new inbound links, and determine if they are connected to Twitter relationships. Brand monitoring – looking for mentions of your firm or products on the web – becomes more important, since more effort is going into your Twitter program. It may also be useful to add Twitter to your lead tracking on contact forms.
Remember that Twitter is not a magic bullet. It takes time for a Twitter presence to take hold, and trends are more important than raw numbers for the first several months. Don’t be concerned if you don’t have a single brand evangelist after a few weeks. If someone jumps on your bandwagon that quickly, it’s probably not the kind of evangelist you want anyway.
In an upcoming post, I’ll talk about a checklist for getting started with a b2b Twitter program.
___________________
Chicago based SEO copywriting, blog consulting, and content marketing.
Content Marketing from Word Sell
- Incoherent Musings of a Twitter Newbie
- Use Twitter to Lay Groundwork for Your Business Blog
- For B2B Twitter Content Ideas, Start with Customers and Work Back
Interactive Marketing from Northbound
- Social Media for Business - The Big Picture (Straight North)
- 7 Ways to Use Twitter for Business (Straight North)
- 7 Ways to Use Facebook for Business (Straight North)











![Recommend [straightnorth: Word Sell]](http://s3.amazonaws.com/arkayne-media/img/badge/logo-recommend-badge-small.png)
There’s much controversy on outsourcing social media activities like Twitter. I help several companies, but I know their personalities and use them to build relationships and share information on the industry they’re in.
Meryl, My experience is similar to yours thus far. You have to be comfortable in social media, which is why I like transparency. That’s why I say the firm and its outsource partner need a close working relationship. If you know the client’s objectives and their communication style, things become so much easier.
Had a great ‘conversation’ with @GarrettPopcorn that started on twitter, moved to ‘real people mode’ in email and then back to twitter. I was able to relay some info, the manager involved proved to be way more interested than I would have expected and they were very nice and sent my mom some popcorn, even though what happened was mostly her fault. Great interaction and I like Garrett even more than before.
The interactions before that had been kind of conversational for the most part – They are part of my Chicago three – @superdawg and @loumalnaties being the other two. It’s kind of fun to shout out a craving once and a while – and to hear your food talk back.
Fred, Your comment is a fabulous mini case study. It’s amazing how injecting a little personality and a caring attitude into conversation can transform and solidify a business relationship. In that regard, Twitter has more power to build customer relationships than a stiff corporate website. Interesting.
I love this, Fred. Thanks for sharing. This is the kind of stuff that makes social media exciting and meaningful.
Brad,
I would be guessing that in the case of B2B:
(a) target audiences is likely to revolve around purchasing managers, operational staff (or whichever personnel actually use the product or service in question, and anyone with sufficient seniority to influence purchasing decision; and
(b) companies would tend to be chasing fewer, bigger business relationships and transactions than would be the case for organisations which deal with a wider mass-market consumer audience.
Because of this, I would have thought that Twitter strategies would tend to lean more toward the conversational in nature.
For companies, aiming at a wider audience where the value of individual accounts is not large, I would have thought that the viability of trying to establish intimate relationships with individual companies would be open to question, and that for these companies, Twitter would be more useful as a platform to broadcasts news and information to a large audience in an efficient and effective manner.
In contrast, for B2B companies, with a clientele aiming at fewer, larger accounts, I would have thought that individual business relationships become more important and that Twitter would hold immense power as a platform to establish new relationships (and strengthen existing ones) as well as a platform for providing news, info and updates.
For this reason, I would have thought that twitter strategies for B2B might tend to focus more upon relationship building (with some informational broadcasting) whereas those focusing on consumer markets would tend to revolve more around the informational broadcasting approach.
Is this generally correct?
Andrew, Thank you for sharing your insights – as usual, your analysis adds clarity to the discussion. You’re making reasonable assumptions and have an accurate take on the differences between b2b and b2c marketing. But Twitter is so new, and used in so many ways, that it’s difficult to generalize. There’s no question that relationships are important in b2b, and that Twitter can enrich them. However, purchasing agents, plant personnel, and engineers cast a wide net online when looking for specific products and services, or for information pertinent to their business. It might well be worth broadcasting news to a wide audience if it leads to even one serious inquiry from the right firm.
Also (I didn’t get into this in this post), there is the situation where a manufacturer of consumer products is using Twitter for brand awareness rather than to generate direct sales. A company such as Procter & Gamble, that has a relatively small customer list, nonetheless wishes to reach a massive audience of consumers. Manufacturers of industrial products can benefit immensely from brand awareness just as well.
So I think for b2b either approach is viable. Create a sound program, test for a sufficient amount of time, and evaluate the results. That’s the only surefire way I know to determine with certainty what a medium like Twitter will do for a firm.
Great to see this clear distinction between the two approaches, Brad. This post is a valuable resource for businesses venturing into this space.
My guess is that there may be a tendency for organisations to underestimate what’s required to deliver on both of these approaches – especially approach two. Even more so given that the results may take some time to manifest.
Best to you, Robin
Hi Robin, You are probably correct about underestimating the time factor. When you talk social media, everybody catches the part about Twitter and LinkedIn being free. But the time element is significant and that time needs to be justified. Actually, it’s not so much the amount of time that begins to weigh heavily, it’s the frequency. You can’t just cram ten hours of work into a Twitter project and be done with it. You have to engage regularly, consistently. This can get to feel like a chore – especially if you feel as though you’re talking into the air. I think we talked about this with regard to blogging … On the other hand, when you start to feel as though you’re talking to somebody, social media gets to be more fun than any type of business communication I can think of. You just have to be patient.
I actually think that there is only one presence that businesses and individuals can employ when using Twitter for a brand and that’s to engage.
Pushing content simply does not work. Twitter and social media are built to be social, it’s in the title. Engagement is key due to all the success stories of brands engaging and getting great responses from their customers.
I would never in a million years simply push content. It is not what the platform is intended for.
Regards
Dan Whitehouse’s last blog ..Top 10 Sci-fi chicks
Hi Dan, No doubt Twitter is built for engagement and many use Twitter for engagement with some success. But is engagement the only thing Twitter is good for? I don’t think so. I use Twitter to engage, but also to find useful information, and sometimes to find special deals. People and corporate sites I trust can push all the content they want: the information helps me.
Brad Shorr’s last blog ..Beware of Tagline-Killing Quotation Marks